Do you think this is hypocritical?

Cecil's main argument agaisnt Mark was Angstrom, probably because Mark is still shaken up about that. But Mark argues that it was an accident, but what about Paul?

I know that this is kinda different, since "Original Paul" is still alive, but Paul's clones are still living and thinking beings that Mark proactively slaughters and we never really see him reconcile that or introspect on it.

And from what we know from Kate, the originals can still feel and experience their clones dying, so it's not like they're just poofing away or  "shutting off" they are straight up dying with their corpses still laid out on the ground.

Like he gets mad at Oliver for killing the Maulers (although he's probably more scared/angry that Oliver is taking after their dad and is so comfortable with killing at a young age), but they're also clones that have died countless time before, with the original definitely being long dead. So is it really any different?