Why do Chinese and English forums have so different views on LeBron James?

I'm Chinese, the translator I used. Comparing the views of Chinese and English forums on historical position and personal strength, it is found that such views as Jordan, Russell, Chamberlain, Jabbar, Duncan, Kobe, O 'Neill, Curry and so on are very close. However, only LeBron James has a huge difference between the two sides. The view here is that James has a stable history and can compete for the first place in history. His individual strength is also the existence of the top five levels, and he can also compete for the first place. However, Chinese forums generally believe that James' historical position is in the second half of the top ten, and his individual ability is generally considered not to be in the top ten. Of course, there are some bloggers with similar ideas, but the following comments are generally against it.Only James will have this situation, and even if other players are controversial, there are small differences. What is the reason for James' big difference? ,